Academically reviewed by Dr. K. Miśkiewicz

Food Choices and Social Signals Test

The same dish can feel like comfort at home, an adventure in a new place or the wrong choice when time is short. What we eat is shaped by appetite, memory, routine, access and company. This test looks at how those influences meet in your own choices, without treating a menu as a measure of status or personal worth.

Take the free Food Choices and Social Signals Test: 42 original questions covering six areas. The questionnaire and basic information are free. If you want to go further, an optional detailed analysis is available for a single one-time payment. It includes six interpretations tailored to your answers, a full response review, reflection prompts, a downloadable report and the companion e-book.

A preference has a setting

Picture choosing lunch in a hurry, then choosing what to bring to a family gathering. The food may be different, but so are the needs around the decision. One choice might follow convenience; another may carry a memory, meet a dietary need or help everyone feel included. The questions invite you to notice those shifts.

Your profile considers six influences: familiar foods and comfort, curiosity about variety, presentation and setting, practical limits such as time or access, the role of shared meals, and the meanings or values attached to taste. None of these explains every meal. Together, they offer more detail than a simple list of favorites.

Six angles on everyday food decisions

  1. Familiarity: the pull of remembered flavors and routines.
  2. Exploration: your willingness to try ingredients, dishes or preparation styles.
  3. Presentation: the effect of appearance and setting on appeal.
  4. Practical conditions: the influence of budget, availability, preparation and dietary needs.
  5. Eating with others: how company and shared customs enter the choice.
  6. Taste and meaning: the memories, values and ideas you connect with food.

A score cannot tell someone why you chose a particular meal. Your own circumstances matter. The detailed interpretation keeps the six areas separate so that curiosity, convenience and social context do not get flattened into one label.

See how your answers fit together

The basic result gives you a first view of your responses. The optional report adds six area scores, explanations linked to your selections and a complete review of all 42 answers. It can help you compare, for example, a strong interest in trying new foods with the practical limits that shape what ends up on your plate.

A single one-time payment also unlocks a downloadable report and Around the Table: Taste, Identity and Everyday Choices. Its exercises explore how memory, setting and shared routines can influence a meal, with prompts for noticing your own priorities.

Answer for the choices you actually make

Think about meals at home, while shopping, eating with others or trying something unfamiliar. Include the realities that affect your options. There are no preferred tastes to perform here; choose the response that best fits your experience. The 42 questions take around 6-9 minutes at a thoughtful pace.

Before you open the questionnaire

Do dietary needs count as part of my answers?

Yes. The questions include practical circumstances as well as preferences. Answer with your real choices and available options in mind.

Will the result rank my taste or background?

No ranking is needed. The report describes the answers you selected across six areas and leaves the context with you.

What is included in the optional analysis?

Six interpretations, an individual review of all 42 responses, reflection prompts, the downloadable PDF and the e-book.

Bibliography

  • Atkinson, W. (2021). The structure of food taste in 21st century Britain. The British Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 169-190. Read publication.
  • Buono Stamer, N. (2018). Moral conventions in food consumption and their relationship to consumers’ social background. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(1), 50-69. Read publication.
  • Pachucki, M. C., Jacques, P. F., & Christakis, N. A. (2011). Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings. American Journal of Public Health, 101(11), 2170-2177. Read publication.
Food Choices and Social Signals Test Made with AI

42 original questions

About 5-8 minutes for your own responses.

6 separate areas

Explore the differences that an overall label can miss.

Free test and basic information

Detailed analysis and the companion e-book are optional, for one payment.